Frontend CV template (Romania): bullet packs + keywords (ATS-friendly)

Frontend CV bullet packs (product impact, performance, accessibility), ATS-friendly structure, and a downloadable template.

Author: Ivo Pereira 14 min Last updated: 2026-01-02

A frontend CV should highlight product impact, performance, accessibility, and reliable delivery (not just “built UI”).

This guide gives you frontend-focused bullet packs and an ATS-friendly structure.

See the general guide: IT CV template (Romania).

TL;DR

  • Put outcomes first: UX, performance (LCP/CLS), consistency, fewer regressions.
  • Show stack + what you shipped with it.
  • Keep bullets specific and verifiable.

Quick checklist

  • Clear headline: “Frontend Engineer (React)” / “Frontend Developer (Vue)”.
  • 3–6 strong bullets for your latest role: performance, UX/a11y, components, testing.
  • 1–2 clean links (especially for junior roles): demo, portfolio, GitHub.
  1. Header + links
  2. Summary (2–4 lines: what UIs you build + stack)
  3. Experience (product outcomes)
  4. Selected projects (optional)
  5. Skills (Languages, Frameworks, Tooling, Testing)
  6. Education (short)

What a good frontend bullet looks like

Action + context (screen/flow) + stack + outcome (metric or verifiable signal).

Examples:

  • “Reduced bundle size by ~30% via code splitting and dependency cleanup (React + Vite), improving mobile load time.”
  • “Improved accessibility (keyboard navigation, aria labels) across key screens, reducing UX issues.”

Tip: when in doubt, write the bullet as “before → after” (what changed).

Bullet library (Frontend)

Performance & Core Web Vitals

  • “Improved LCP/CLS via lazy loading and image optimization, improving page performance on mobile.”
  • “Reduced bundle size via code splitting and build optimizations (React/Vite), improving load time.”
  • “Used virtualization/memoization to speed up rendering on a complex screen.”
  • “Added performance budgets and CI checks to prevent bundle regressions.”
  • “Improved perceived performance via prefetching and caching for common routes.”

UX & accessibility

  • “Improved keyboard navigation and a11y labels, reducing usability issues.”
  • “Standardized form validation and error states, improving clarity and reducing support tickets.”
  • “Improved empty/loading/error states across flows, making edge cases clearer to users.”

Design system & components

  • “Built a reusable component library and tokens, improving UI consistency and delivery speed.”
  • “Migrated legacy screens to shared primitives (Button/Input/Modal), reducing duplication.”
  • “Documented component usage and guidelines, reducing UI inconsistency across teams.”

State & data fetching

  • “Simplified state by separating server state from UI state, reducing bugs and complexity.”
  • “Improved resilience on slow networks by adding retries, caching, and better loading states.”

Testing & reliability

  • “Added component and E2E tests for critical flows, reducing regressions.”
  • “Reduced E2E flakiness by stabilizing selectors and test setup.”
  • “Improved error monitoring by adding client-side logging around critical failures.”

Useful keywords (use only what you actually did)

  • React/Vue/Angular, TypeScript
  • bundling, code splitting, performance profiling
  • accessibility (a11y), semantic HTML
  • testing: unit/component/E2E
  • design systems, tokens, component libraries

Common mistakes

  • Only listing frameworks without showing outcomes.
  • Describing pages/features without impact (performance, UX, clarity, reliability).
  • Too many “skills” without any proof in bullets/projects.
  • Copying the job description into the CV instead of showing what changed because of your work.
  • Hiding your strongest work behind a long “Skills” section.

Frontend CV template

Download: DOCX · TXT

FAQ

Is a portfolio required?

Not required, but it helps—especially for junior roles. Even a small demo with a clean README can be a strong signal.

Should I include design tools (Figma, etc.)?

Only if you used them meaningfully (handoffs, specs, component work). It’s optional; outcomes matter more than tool names.